从体育课到休闲时间儿童青少年身体活动促进的探索:基于自我决定理论

朱姣, 毛志雄

首都体育学院学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2) : 164-171.

PDF(1193 KB)
中文  |  English
PDF(1193 KB)
首都体育学院学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2) : 164-171. DOI: 10.14036/j.cnki.cn11-4513.2025.02.007
体育与健康中国

从体育课到休闲时间儿童青少年身体活动促进的探索:基于自我决定理论

作者信息 +

Exploration of Physical Activity Promotion of Children and Adolescents from Physical Education to Leisure Time:Based on Self-determination Theory

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

儿童青少年的身体活动不足已经成为世界难题。很多研究以自我决定理论为理论基础,对促进儿童青少年的身体活动展开探讨。可以认为,在儿童青少年的体育课、校内课外体育活动与校外休闲时间阶段分别为其提供自主支持(需要支持)的策略,儿童青少年可以获得更积极的身体活动体验,不同情境下对应的主要支持者不尽相同。同时,体育教师在体育课上提供的自主支持(需要支持)可以通过身体活动自主动机的传递影响儿童青少年校外休闲时间的身体活动,这其中的潜在机制可能是跨情境模型。建议:1)基于自我决定理论继续完善不同情境下的需要支持策略;2)在后续研究中充分考虑性别差异;3)继续探讨不同情境中儿童青少年身体活动促进的机制,探析其中的关键变量。

Abstract

Insufficient physical activity among children and adolescents has become a global challenge. Many researchers have adopted the self-determination theory(SDT) as a theoretical framework to promote physical activity in this population. It is suggested that providing need-supportive strategies(e.g., autonomy support) during physical education classes, school-based extracurricular activities, and leisure time outside school can enhance children and adolescents'positive physical activity experience, with different primary supporters identified across these contexts. Furthermore, autonomy support (need support) provided by physical education teachers in class may influence children and adolescents'leisure-time physical activity through the mediation of autonomous motivation for physical activity, with the trans-contextual model (TCM) potentially explaining this cross-contextual mechanism. Recommendations include: 1) Refining need-supportive strategies across contexts based on SDT; 2) Fully considering gender differences in future research; 3) Further exploring mechanisms and key variables that promote physical activity among children and adolescents in different settings.

关键词

儿童 / 青少年 / 身体活动 / 自我决定理论

Key words

children / adolescents / physical activity / SDT

引用本文

导出引用
朱姣 , 毛志雄. 从体育课到休闲时间儿童青少年身体活动促进的探索:基于自我决定理论[J]. 首都体育学院学报. 2025, 37(2): 164-171 https://doi.org/10.14036/j.cnki.cn11-4513.2025.02.007
ZHU Jiao , MAO Zhixiong. Exploration of Physical Activity Promotion of Children and Adolescents from Physical Education to Leisure Time:Based on Self-determination Theory[J]. Journal of Capital University of Physical Education and Sports. 2025, 37(2): 164-171 https://doi.org/10.14036/j.cnki.cn11-4513.2025.02.007
中图分类号: G804.8 (运动心理学)   

参考文献

[1]
LOPRINZI P D, CARDINAL B J, LOPRINZI K L, et al. Benefits and environmental determinants of physical activity in children and adolescents[J]. Obesity Facts, 2012, 5(4): 597-610.
[2]
WOODS J, HUTCHINSON N T, POWERS S K, et al. The COVID-19 pandemic and physical activity[J]. Sports Medicine and Health Science, 2020(2): 59-64.
[3]
TELAMA R, YANG X, VIIKARI J, et al. Physical activity from childhood to adulthood[J]. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2005, 28(3): 267-273.
[4]
MATHISEN F K S, TORSHEIM T, FALCO C, et al. Leisure-time physical activity trajectories from adolescence to adulthood in relation to several activity domains: A 27-year longitudinal study[J]. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2023, 20(1): 1-15.
[5]
MCVEIGH J, SMITH A, HOWIE E, et al. Trajectories of television watching from childhood to early adulthood and their association with body composition and mental health outcomes in young adults[J]. Plos One, 2016, 11(4): 1-12.
[6]
SINGH A S, SALIASI E, DEN B V, et al. Effects of physical activity interventions on cognitive and academic performance in children and adolescents: A novel combination of a systematic review and recommendations from an expert panel[J]. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2019, 53(10): 640-647.
To summarise the current evidence on the effects of physical activity (PA) interventions on cognitive and academic performance in children, and formulate research priorities and recommendations.Systematic review (following PRISMA guidelines) with a methodological quality assessment and an international expert panel. We based the evaluation of the consistency of the scientific evidence on the findings reported in studies rated as of high methodological quality.PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, ERIC, and SPORTDiscus.PA-intervention studies in children with at least one cognitive or academic performance assessment.Eleven (19%) of 58 included intervention studies received a high-quality rating for methodological quality: four assessed effects of PA interventions on cognitive performance, six assessed effects on academic performance, and one on both. All high-quality studies contrasted the effects of additional/adapted PA activities with regular curriculum activities. For cognitive performance 10 of 21 (48%) constructs analysed showed statistically significant beneficial intervention effects of PA, while for academic performance, 15 of 25 (60%) analyses found a significant beneficial effect of PA. Across all five studies assessing PA effects on mathematics, beneficial effects were reported in six out of seven (86%) outcomes. Experts put forward 46 research questions. The most pressing research priority cluster concerned the causality of the relationship between PA and cognitive/academic performance. The remaining clusters pertained to PA characteristics, moderators and mechanisms governing the 'PA-performance' relationship and miscellaneous topics.There is currently inconclusive evidence for the beneficial effects of PA interventions on cognitive and overall academic performance in children. We conclude that there is strong evidence for beneficial effects of PA on maths performance.The expert panel confirmed that more 'high-quality' research is warranted. By prioritising the most important research questions and formulating recommendations we aim to guide researchers in generating high-quality evidence. Our recommendations focus on adequate control groups and sample size, the use of valid and reliable measurement instruments for physical activity and cognitive performance, measurement of compliance and data analysis.CRD42017082505.© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
[7]
BIDDLE S J H, ASARE M. Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents: A review of reviews[J]. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2011, 45(11): 886-895.
To synthesise reviews investigating physical activity and depression, anxiety, self-esteem and cognitive functioning in children and adolescents and to assess the association between sedentary behaviour and mental health by performing a brief review.Searches were performed in 2010. Inclusion criteria specified review articles reporting chronic physical activity and at least one mental health outcome that included depression, anxiety/stress, self-esteem and cognitive functioning in children or adolescents.Four review articles reported evidence concerning depression, four for anxiety, three for self-esteem and seven for cognitive functioning. Nine primary studies assessed associations between sedentary behaviour and mental health. Physical activity has potentially beneficial effects for reduced depression, but the evidence base is limited. Intervention designs are low in quality, and many reviews include cross-sectional studies. Physical activity interventions have been shown to have a small beneficial effect for reduced anxiety, but the evidence base is limited. Physical activity can lead to improvements in self-esteem, at least in the short term. However, there is a paucity of good quality research. Reviews on physical activity and cognitive functioning have provided evidence that routine physical activity can be associated with improved cognitive performance and academic achievement, but these associations are usually small and inconsistent. Primary studies showed consistent negative associations between mental health and sedentary behaviour.Association between physical activity and mental health in young people is evident, but research designs are often weak and effects are small to moderate. Evidence shows small but consistent associations between sedentary screen time and poorer mental health.
[8]
RODRIGUEZ A M, CADENAS S C, ESTEVEZ L F, et al. Role of physical activity and sedentary behavior in the mental health of preschoolers, children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Sports Medicine, 2019, 49(9): 1383-1410.
[9]
CHAPUT J, WILLUMSEN J, BULL F, et al. 2020 WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour for children and adolescents aged 5-17 years: Summary of the evidence[J]. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2020, 17(1): 1-9.
[10]
王丽娟.5-18岁儿童青少年24 h活动研究:现状、影响因素与健康效应[J]. 中国体育科技, 2022, 58(1): 46-56.
[11]
GUTHOLD R, STEVENS G A, RILEY L M, et al. Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: A pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1.6 million participants[J]. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 2020, 4(1): 23-35.
[12]
CHEN P. Physical activity, physical fitness, and body mass index in the chinese child and adolescent populations: An update from the 2016 physical activity and fitness in China—the youth study[J]. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 2017, 6(4): 381-383.
[13]
范卉颖, 唐炎, 张加林. 城市初中生课外身体活动水平及影响因素探究[J]. 体育学刊, 2020, 27(5):109-116.
[14]
彭李奥, 柳鸣毅, 敬艳, 等. 中国儿童青少年身体活动的地区差异性[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2024, 45(9): 1290-1293, 1299.
[15]
关于进一步减轻义务教育阶段学生作业负担和校外培训负担的意见[EB/OL].(2021-07-24)[2024-11-23]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-07/24/content_5627132.htm.
[16]
教育部发展改革委财政部卫生健康委市场监管总局关于全面加强和改进新时代学校卫生与健康教育工作的意见[EB/OL].(2021-08-02)[2024-11-23]. https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2021/content_5651736.htm.
[17]
专家组. “双减”政策与学校体育发展[J]. 上海体育学院学报, 2021, 45(11):1-15.
[18]
陈曦, 苏坚贞. “交叠影响域”理论视域下课外体育作业的三重困境及其出路[J]. 体育学刊, 2020, 27(2):124-128.
[19]
DENG A, ZARRETT N, MOON J S A M. Changing trajectory of daily physical activity levels among at-risk adolescents: Influences of motivational mechanisms[J]. BMC Public Health, 2023, 23(1): 1-11.
[20]
HAGGER M, CHATZISARANTIS N. Self-determination theory and the psychology of exercise[J]. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2008, 1(1): 79-103.
[21]
DECI E L, RYAN R M. The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality[J]. Journal of Research in Personality, 1985, 19(2): 109-134.
[22]
RYAN R M, DECI E L. Self-determination theory:Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness[M]. New York: Guilford Press, 2017.
[23]
DECI E L, VALLERAND R J, PELLETIER L G. Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective[J]. Educational Psychologist, 1991, 26(3/4): 325-346.
[24]
HAGGER M S, CHATZISARANTIS N L D. Advances in self-determination theory research in sport and exercise[J]. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 2007, 8(5): 597-599.
[25]
HOWARD J L, GAGNÉ M, BUREAU J S. Testing a continuum structure of self-determined motivation: A meta-analysis[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 2017, 143(12): 1346-1377.
Self-determination theory proposes a multidimensional representation of motivation comprised of several factors said to fall along a continuum of relative autonomy. The current meta-analysis examined the relationships between these motivation factors in order to demonstrate how reliably they conformed to a predictable continuum-like pattern. Based on data from 486 samples representing over 205,000 participants who completed 1 of 13 validated motivation scales, the results largely supported a continuum-like structure of motivation and indicate that self-determination is central in explaining human motivation. Further examination of heterogeneity indicated that while regulations were predictably ordered across domains and scales, the exact distance between subscales varied across samples in a way that was not explainable by a set of moderators. Results did not support the inclusion of integrated regulation or the 3 subscales of intrinsic motivation (i.e., intrinsic motivation to know, to experience stimulation, and to achieve) due to excessively high interfactor correlations and overlapping confidence intervals. Recommendations for scale refinements and the scoring of motivation are provided. (PsycINFO Database Record(c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).
[26]
SHELDON K M, ELLIOT K M, KIM A J, et al. What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, 80(2): 325-339.
Three studies compared 10 candidate psychological needs in an attempt to determine which are truly most fundamental for humans. Participants described "most satisfying events" within their lives and then rated the salience of each of the 10 candidate needs within these events. Supporting self-determination theory postulates (Ryan & Deci, 2000)--autonomy, competence, and relatedness, were consistently among the top 4 needs, in terms of both their salience and their association with event-related affect. Self-esteem was also important, whereas self-actualization or meaning, physical thriving, popularity or influence, and money-luxury were less important. This basic pattern emerged within three different time frames and within both U.S. and South Korean samples and also within a final study that asked, "What's unsatisfying about unsatisfying events?" Implications for hierarchical theories of needs are discussed.
[27]
林崇德. 需要是教育与发展的动力源[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1):1-7.
[28]
CHEN B, VANSTEENKISTE M, BEYERS W, et al. Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures[J]. Motivation and Emotion, 2015, 39(2): 216-236.
[29]
STANLEY P J, SCHUTTE N, PHILLIPS W. A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between basic psychological need satisfaction and affect[J]. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 2021, 5(1): 1-16.
[30]
WESTERSKOV D B, ELMOSE-OSTERLUND K, BREDAHL T. Exploring basic psychological needs within and across domains of physical activity[J]. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 2024, 19(1): 1-19.
[31]
MILYAVSKAYA M, GINGRAS I, GENEVIÉVE A M, et al. Balance across contexts: Importance of balanced need satisfaction across various life domains[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2009, 35(8): 1031-1045.
Self-determination theory posits that satisfaction of three basic psychological needs-autonomy, competence, and relatedness-are required for psychological well-being, and a recent study showed that the balance in the satisfaction of these three needs independently affects well-being. The present investigation builds on these findings by examining the balance of adolescents' need satisfaction across distinct life contexts. The results of three studies show that adolescents who experience a balance of need satisfaction across important life contexts, including at school, at home, with friends, and in part-time jobs, reported higher well-being and better school adjustment. This finding emerged consistently across four countries and across multiple measures of school adjustment, including teacher reports. Together, these results support previous research that highlights the importance of consistency for psychological functioning.
[32]
吴才智, 荣硕, 朱芳婷, 等. 基本心理需要及其满足[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018(6):1063-1073.
Deci和Ryan在前人基础上提出基本心理需要的概念, 并将人的基本心理需要划分为胜任需要、关系需要和自主需要。基本心理需要来源于自我决定理论(SDT)。目前, 对于基本心理需要的测量主要是采用Gagné编写的一般需要满足量表(GNSS)。基本心理需要的满足主要受到个体所处环境的影响, 且与个体的心理健康有着密切的联系, 基本心理需要受挫则会导致个体的焦虑、压抑。对于基本心理需要的质疑主要集中在需要的内容、各需要之间是否矛盾、需要是否会改变以及需要的普适性四个方面。未来有必要加强对基本心理需要的测量及需要受挫的研究, 同时加强纵向研究, 以及对于基本心理需要满足策略的研究。
[33]
DECI E L, RYAN R M. The support of autonomy and the control of behavior[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, 53(6): 1024-1037.
In this article we suggest that events and contexts relevant to the initiation and regulation of intentional behavior can function either to support autonomy (i.e., to promote choice) or to control behavior (i.e., to pressure one toward specific outcomes). Research herein reviewed indicates that this distinction is relevant to specific external events and to general interpersonal contexts as well as to specific internal events and to general personality orientations. That is, the distinction is relevant whether one's analysis focuses on social psychological variables or on personality variables. The research review details those contextual and person factors that tend to promote autonomy and those that tend to control. Furthermore, it shows that autonomy support has generally been associated with more intrinsic motivation, greater interest, less pressure and tension, more creativity, more cognitive flexibility, better conceptual learning, a more positive emotional tone, higher self-esteem, more trust, greater persistence of behavior change, and better physical and psychological health than has control. Also, these results have converged across different assessment procedures, different research methods, and different subject populations. On the basis of these results, we present an organismic perspective in which we argue that the regulation of intentional behavior varies along a continuum from autonomous (i.e., self-determined) to controlled. The relation of this organismic perspective to historical developments in empirical psychology is discussed, with a particular emphasis on its implications for the study of social psychology and personality.
[34]
RYAN R M, WILLIAMS G C, PATRICK H, et al. Self-determination theory and physical activity: The dynamics of motivation in development and wellness[J]. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 2009, 6(2): 107-124.
[35]
WANG Y, WANG H, WANG S, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of self-determination-theory-based interventions in the education context[J]. Learning and Motivation, 2024, 87: 1-28.
[36]
RYAN R M, DECI E L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being[J]. The American Psychologist, 2000, 55(1): 68-78.
[37]
NTOUMANIS N. A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education[J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2001, 71(2): 225-242.
[38]
REEVE J, JANG H, CARRELL D, et al. Enhancing students“ engagement by increasing teachers”autonomy support[J]. Motivation and Emotion, 2004, 28(2): 147-169.
[39]
STANDAGE M, DUDA J L, NTOUMANIS N. Students'motivational processes and their relationship to teacher ratings in school physical education: A self-determination theory approach[J]. Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health, 2006, 77(1): 100-110.
[40]
孙开宏, 季浏, 王春芳. 小学高年级女生体育课中的自主支持感与动机定向之间的关系:基本心理需要的中介作用[J]. 天津体育学院学报, 2010, 25(5): 410-413.
[41]
LONSDALE C, SABISTON C M, RAEDEKE T D, et al. Self-determined motivation and students'physical activity during structured physical education lessons and free choice periods[J]. Preventive Medicine, 2009, 48(1): 69-73.
[42]
AELTERMAN N, VANSTEENKISTE M, VAN K H, et al. Students'objectively measured physical activity levels and engagement as a function of between-class and between-student differences in motivation toward physical education[J]. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 2012, 34(4): 457-480.
[43]
LONSDALE C, ROSENKRANZ R R, SANDERS T, et al. A cluster randomized controlled trial of strategies to increase adolescents'physical activity and motivation in physical education: Results of the motivating active learning in physical education (MALP) trial[J]. Preventive Medicine, 2013, 57(5): 696-702.
[44]
SPARKS C, LONSDALE C, DIMMOCK J, et al. An intervention to improve teachers' interpersonally involving instructional practices in high school physical education: Implications for student relatedness support and in-class experiences[J]. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2017, 39(2): 120-133.
[45]
HA A S, LONSDALE C, LUBANS D R, et al. Increasing students' physical activity during school physical education: Rationale and protocol for the SELF-FIT cluster randomized controlled trial[J]. BMC Public Health, 2018, 18(1): 1-11.
[46]
NTOUMANIS N, NG J, PRESTWICH A, et al. A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: Effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health[J]. Health Psychology Review, 2021, 15(2): 214-244.
[47]
BEHZADNIA B, REZAEI F, SALEHI M. A need-supportive teaching approach among students with intellectual disability in physical education[J]. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2022, 60: 1-15.
[48]
胡小清, 唐炎, 黄霞, 等. 基于自我决定动机理论视角下的体育学习效果研究进展[J]. 体育科学, 2020, 40(4): 67-77.
[49]
KING R B, HAW J Y, WANG Y. Need-support facilitates well-being across cultural, economic, and political contexts: A self-determination theory perspective[J]. Learning and Instruction, 2024, 93: 1-14.
[50]
JAGO R, SEBIRE S J, DAVIES B, et al. Randomised feasibility trial of a teaching assistant led extracurricular physical activity intervention for 9 to 11 year olds: Action 3:30[J]. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition & Physical Activity, 2014, 11: 1-14.
[51]
JAGO R, TIBBITTS B, SANDERSON E, et al. Action 3:30R: Results of a cluster randomised feasibility study of a revised teaching assistant-led extracurricular physical activity intervention for 8 to 10 year olds[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16(1): 1-15.
[52]
JAGO R, EDWARDS M J, SEBIRE S J, et al. Bristol girls dance project: A cluster randomised controlled trial of an after-school dance programme to increase physical activity among 11- to 12-year-old girls[J]. Public Health Research, 2016, 4(6): 1-176.
[53]
SEBIRE S J, KESTEN J M, EDWARDS M J, et al. Using self-determination theory to promote adolescent girls' physical activity: Exploring the theoretical fidelity of the bristol girls dance project[J]. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2016, 24: 100-110.
To report the theory-based process evaluation of the Bristol Girls' Dance Project, a cluster-randomised controlled trial to increase adolescent girls' physical activity.A mixed-method process evaluation of the intervention's self-determination theory components comprising lesson observations, post-intervention interviews and focus groups.Four intervention dance lessons per dance instructor were observed, audio recorded and rated to estimate the use of need-supportive teaching strategies. Intervention participants (n = 281) reported their dance instructors' provision of autonomy-support. Semi-structured interviews with the dance instructors (n = 10) explored fidelity to the theory and focus groups were conducted with participants (n = 59) in each school to explore their receipt of the intervention and views on the dance instructors' motivating style.Although instructors accepted the theory-based approach, intervention fidelity was variable. Relatedness support was the most commonly observed need-supportive teaching behaviour, provision of structure was moderate and autonomy-support was comparatively low. The qualitative findings identified how instructors supported competence and developed trusting relationships with participants. Fidelity was challenged where autonomy provision was limited to option choices rather than input into the pace or direction of lessons and where controlling teaching styles were adopted, often to manage disruptive behaviour.The successes and challenges to achieving theoretical fidelity in the Bristol Girls' Dance Project may help explain the intervention effects and can more broadly inform the design of theory-based complex interventions aimed at increasing young people's physical activity in after-school settings.
[54]
MURPHY M H, O'KANE S M, CARLIN A, et al. Efectiveness of the walking in schools (WISH) study, a peer-led walking intervention for adolescent girls: Results of a cluster randomised controlled trial[J]. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2024, 21: 1-19.
[55]
BAUMAN A, MCNEIL N, NICHOLSON M, et al. Impact of the first year of the “This girl can” physical activity and sport mass media campaign in australia[J]. BMC Public Health, 2023, 23(1): 1-8.
[56]
HAGGER M S, CHATZISARANTIS N L D, CULVERHOUSE T, et al. The processes by which perceived autonomy support in physical education promotes leisure-time physical activity intentions and behavior: A trans-contextual model[J]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2013, 95(4): 784-795.
[57]
EDMUNDS J, NTOUMANIS N, DUDA J L. Testing a self-determination theory-based teaching style intervention in the exercise domain[J]. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2010, 38(2): 375-388.
[58]
WANG C K J, ANG R P, TEO-KOH S M, et al. Motivational predictors of young adolescents'participation in an outdoor adventure course: A self-determination theory approach[J]. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 2004, 4(1): 57-65.
[59]
FENNER A A, HOWIE E K, STRAKER L M, et al. Exploration of the mechanisms of change in constructs from self-determination theory and quality of life during a multidisciplinary family-based intervention for overweight adolescents[J]. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2016, 38(1): 59-68.
[60]
MCDAVID L, MCDONOUGH M H, BLANKENSHIP B T, et al. A test of basic psychological needs theory in a physical-activity-based program for underserved youth[J]. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 2017, 39(1): 29-42.
[61]
WATCHMAN T, SPENCER C N. Times have changed: Parent perspectives on children's free play and sport[J]. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2017, 32: 102-112.
[62]
ZENG T, NG J Y Y, LUBANS D R, et al. A family-based physical activity intervention guided by self-determination theory: Facilitators'and participants'perceptions[J]. International Journal of Educational Research, 2024, 127: 1-12.
[63]
GILETTA M, CHOUKAS B S, MAES M, et al. A meta-analysis of longitudinal peer influence effects in childhood and adolescence[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 2021, 147(7): 719-747.
For decades, psychological research has examined the extent to which children's and adolescents' behavior is influenced by the behavior of their peers (i.e., peer influence effects). This review provides a comprehensive synthesis and meta-analysis of this vast field of psychological science, with a goal to quantify the magnitude of peer influence effects across a broad array of behaviors (externalizing, internalizing, academic). To provide a rigorous test of peer influence effects, only studies that employed longitudinal designs, controlled for youths' baseline behaviors, and used "external informants" (peers' own reports or other external reporters) were included. These criteria yielded a total of 233 effect sizes from 60 independent studies across four different continents. A multilevel meta-analytic approach, allowing the inclusion of multiple dependent effect sizes from the same study, was used to estimate an average cross-lagged regression coefficient, indicating the extent to which peers' behavior predicted changes in youths' own behavior over time. Results revealed a peer influence effect that was small in magnitude (β¯ =.08) but significant and robust. Peer influence effects did not vary as a function of the behavioral outcome, age, or peer relationship type (one close friend vs. multiple friends). Time lag and peer context emerged as significant moderators, suggesting stronger peer influence effects over shorter time periods, and when the assessment of peer relationships was not limited to the classroom context. Results provide the most thorough and comprehensive synthesis of childhood and adolescent peer influence to date, indicating that peer influence occurs similarly across a broad range of behaviors and attitudes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
[64]
VIERLING K K, STANDAGE M, TREASURE D C. Predicting attitudes and physical activity in an“at-risk” minority youth sample: A test of self-determination theory[J]. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 2007, 8(5): 795-817.
[65]
MCDAVID L, COX A E, MCDONOUGH M H. Need fulfillment and motivation in physical education predict trajectories of change in leisure-time physical activity in early adolescence[J]. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2014, 15(5): 471-480.
[66]
WANG L. Using the self-determination theory to understand Chinese adolescent leisure-time physical activity[J]. European Journal of Sport Science, 2017, 17(4): 453-461.
This study applies the self-determination theory (SDT) to test the hypothesized relationships among perceived autonomy support from parents, physical education (PE) teachers, and peers, the fulfilment of psychological needs (i.e., autonomy, competence, and relatedness), autonomous motivation, and leisure-time physical activity of Chinese adolescents.There are 255 grade six to eight student participants from four middle schools around Shanghai, China included in this study. An accelerometer was used to measure the moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). The participants completed the questionnaires regarding SDT variables. The structural equation modelling was applied to examine the hypothesized relationships among the study variables.The model of hypothesized relationships demonstrated a good fit with the data [X = 20.84, df = 9, P = .01; CFI = 0.98; IFI = 0.98; SRMR = 0.04; RMSEA = 0.05]. The findings revealed that autonomy support from parents, PE teachers, and peers foster social conditions in which the three basic psychological needs can be met. In turn, autonomy, competence, and relatedness are positively associated with autonomous motivation for MVPA. The autonomous motivation positively relates to the MVPA time of adolescents. The three psychological needs partially mediate the influence of autonomy support from parents (β = 0.18, P < .01; Bootstrap 95% CI = 0.06-0.33) and teachers (β = 0.17, P < .01; Bootstrap 95% CI = 0.03-0.26) in the autonomous motivation.In conclusion, these findings support the applicability of SDT in understanding and promoting physical activity of Chinese adolescents.
[67]
HAGGER M S, CHATZISARANTIS N L D, CULVERHOUSE T, et al. The processes by which perceived autonomy support in physical education promotes leisure-time physical activity intentions and behavior: A trans-contextual model[J]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2003, 95(4): 784-795.
[68]
KUHL J, BECKMANN J. Action-control: From cognition to behavior[M]. Heidelberg: Springer, 1985: 11-39.
[69]
VALLERAND R J. A hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and exercise[J]. Advances in Motivation in Sport and Exercise, 2001, 2: 263-319.
[70]
HAGGER M S, CHATZISARANTIS N L D. The trans-contextual model of autonomous motivation in education: conceptual and empirical issues and meta-analysis[J]. Review of Educational Research, 2016, 86(2): 360-407.
The trans-contextual model outlines the processes by which autonomous motivation toward activities in a physical education context predicts autonomous motivation toward physical activity outside of school, and beliefs about, intentions toward, and actual engagement in, out-of-school physical activity. In the present article, we clarify the fundamental propositions of the model and resolve some outstanding conceptual issues, including its generalizability across multiple educational domains, criteria for its rejection or failed replication, the role of belief-based antecedents of intentions, and the causal ordering of its constructs. We also evaluate the consistency of model relationships in previous tests of the model using path-analytic meta-analysis. The analysis supported model hypotheses but identified substantial heterogeneity in the hypothesized relationships across studies unattributed to sampling and measurement error. Based on our meta-analysis, future research needs to provide further replications of the model in diverse educational settings beyond physical education and test model hypotheses using experimental methods.
[71]
尹龙, 李芳, 司虎克. 体育课需求支持对青少年闲暇时间体力活动的影响:跨情境模型的构建与检验[J]. 体育与科学, 2018, 39(1):90-100, 120.
[72]
HAGGER M, CHATZISARANTIS N L D, HEIN V, et al. Teacher, peer and parent autonomy support in physical education and leisure-time physical activity: A trans-contextual model of motivation in four nations[J]. Psychology and Health, 2009, 24(6): 689-711.
[73]
HAGGER M. The trans-contextual model of motivation : an integrated multi-theory model to explain the processes of motivational transfer across context[D]. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä, 2014: 203.
[74]
MADSEN E E, KRUSTRUP P, HANSEN T, et al. Motivational predictors of children's involvement in out-of-school activities: An application of a football program[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 2022, 33: 72-83.

基金

北京市社会科学基金项目(22YTC036)

PDF(1193 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/