Data Pollution Risks and Construction of Governance Rules for E-sports AI

LIU Fuyuan

Journal of Capital University of Physical Education and Sports ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2) : 125-133.

PDF(1617 KB)
PDF(1617 KB)
Journal of Capital University of Physical Education and Sports ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2) : 125-133. DOI: 10.14036/j.cnki.cn11-4513.2025.02.002
Sports Technology Innovation

Data Pollution Risks and Construction of Governance Rules for E-sports AI

Author information +
History +

Abstract

With the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) in recent years, it has already or is poised to implement multiple functions in e-sports, such as assisted training, assisted refereeing, and intelligent broadcasting. However, while AI drives the advancement of e-sports, it also faces corresponding risks of data pollution. For instance, useless player data may reduce the effectiveness of Character AI, outdated match data may compromise the timeliness of intelligent broadcasting, and fabricated officiating data may undermine the fairness of AI refereeing. To address these risks, the primary response strategy is to establish data governance rules in the form of laws and policies.. This involves establishing mechanisms such as the regulation of annotation types, data screening rules, and pre-set standard controls during three stages: data structuring, data screening, and the establishment of the data governance system. These measures ensure the usability and generalizability of collected e-sports data, extract data subsets that meet specific conditions, and ultimately achieve comprehensive prevention of data pollution risks through e-sports data governance rules.

Key words

E-sports / AI / Risks of Data Pollution / Risk Inspection / Governance Rules

Cite this article

Download Citations
LIU Fuyuan. Data Pollution Risks and Construction of Governance Rules for E-sports AI[J]. Journal of Capital University of Physical Education and Sports. 2025, 37(2): 125-133 https://doi.org/10.14036/j.cnki.cn11-4513.2025.02.002

References

[1]
毕文轩. 生成式人工智能的风险规制困境及其化解:以ChatGPT的规制为视角[J]. 比较法研究, 2023(3): 155-172.
[2]
揭秘GPT-4核心数据:1.8万亿参数,13万亿训练数据[Z/OL]. (2023-07-12)[2025-03-16]. https://www.163.com/dy/article/I9EKOUJ0055240KW.html.
[3]
《英雄联盟》系列产品全球月活跃用户达1.8亿!拳头:数字仍在增长[Z/OL]. (2021-11-02) [2025-03-16]. https://news.mydrivers.com/1/793/793383.htm.
[4]
张涛. 生成式人工智能训练数据集的法律风险与包容审慎规制[J]. 比较法研究, 2024 (4): 86-103.
[5]
支振锋. 生成式人工智能大模型的信息内容治理[J]. 政法论坛, 2023, 41(4):34-48.
[6]
孙祁. 规范生成式人工智能产品提供者的法律问题研究[J]. 政治与法律, 2023 (7):162-176.
[7]
孙雷亮. 基于GPT模型的人工智能数据伪造风险研究[J]. 信息安全研究, 2023, 9(6): 518-523.
[8]
刘佳明. 人工智能体育裁判的风险及其法律规制[J]. 天津体育学院学报, 2023, 38(4): 449-454.
[9]
扬纳卡基斯, 图吉利斯. 人工智能与游戏[M]. 卢俊楷,等, 译. 北京: 机械工业出版社,2019:16-17.
[10]
中国面向人工智能的数据治理行业研究报告(2022)[R/OL].(2022-03-29)[2025-03-16]. https://report.iresearch.cn/report/202203/3962.shtml.
[11]
马月坤, 陈昊. 人工智能导论[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社,2021:9.
[12]
米林顿. 游戏中的人工智能[M]. 张俊,译. 北京: 清华大学出版社,2021:551.
PDF(1617 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/