Research on the Factors Influencing Environmentally Responsible Behavior of Sports Tourists and Sightseeing Tourists - An analysis based on SEM and fsQCA

SHE Yuxin, CHEN Xi, JIA Lingjuan, XUE Tao

Journal of Capital University of Physical Education and Sports ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4) : 414-424.

PDF(1650 KB)
PDF(1650 KB)
Journal of Capital University of Physical Education and Sports ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4) : 414-424. DOI: 10.14036/j.cnki.cn11-4513.2025.04.006
Sports Governance and Sports Industry

Research on the Factors Influencing Environmentally Responsible Behavior of Sports Tourists and Sightseeing Tourists - An analysis based on SEM and fsQCA

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Understanding the formation mechanism of tourists’environmentally responsible behavior plays a crucial role in promoting environmental protection at tourist destinations. This study selected two coastal tourist areas in Hainan Province, which are mainly focused on sports tourism and sightseeing tourism respectively, as the locations for distributing questionnaires. Using Structural Equation modeling(SEM) and fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), the study explored the influencing factors and driving mechanisms of environmentally responsible behavior among sports tourists and sightseeing tourists. The results of the study show that: 1)Recreational experience preference and place attachment have a significant positive impact on environmental responsibility behavior. Recreational experience preference have a significant positive impact on place attachment, which also plays a partial mediating role in this process. 2)The recreational experience preference and place attachment of sports tourists have a more significant impact on their environmental responsible behavior. The promoting effect of sports tourists’recreational experience preference on their place attachment is more significant than that of sightseeing tourists. Additionally, the mediating role of place attachment in the relationship between recreational experience preferences and environmentally responsible behavior is more significant for sports tourists than for sightseeing tourists. 3)Eight endogenous factors form three configuration paths for sports tourists’environmentally responsible behavior and six configuration paths for sightseeing tourists’environmentally responsible behavior. 4)The environmentally responsible behavior of sports tourists is mainly characterized by an active emotional-driven mechanism, while that of sightseeing tourists is mainly characterized a more complex and diversified driving mechanism.

Key words

environmentally responsible behavior / place attachment / recreational experience preference / structural equation modeling / fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis

Cite this article

Download Citations
SHE Yuxin , CHEN Xi , JIA Lingjuan , et al. Research on the Factors Influencing Environmentally Responsible Behavior of Sports Tourists and Sightseeing Tourists - An analysis based on SEM and fsQCA[J]. Journal of Capital University of Physical Education and Sports. 2025, 37(4): 414-424 https://doi.org/10.14036/j.cnki.cn11-4513.2025.04.006

References

[1]
段正梁, 彭振, 贺小荣. 旅游者生态价值观对其环境责任行为的影响——以岳麓山风景区为例[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2021, 40(1):132-137,167.
[2]
谢海丽, 罗文斌. 城市景区游客环境责任行为影响机理及其群组差异研究——基于多群组结构方程模型[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2023, 37(12):201-208.
[3]
RICE W L, TAFF D, MILLER Z D, et al. Connecting motivations to outcomes: A study of park visitors’ outcome attainment[J]. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 2020, 29: 100272.
[4]
吴建兴, 吴茂英, 郭英之, 等. 旅游地居民环境责任行为研究进展与展望[J]. 旅游学刊, 2023, 38(11):140-152.
[5]
杨效忠, 王杏. 山岳型景区特殊时段旅游拥挤特征及调控模式——以黄山风景区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(4):961-970.
世界遗产地空间潮汐式旅游拥挤问题相当普遍且日益凸显,已成为旅游地理学研究的前沿领域。以黄山风景区为例,基于旅游拥挤多维内涵,构建物理拥挤和心理拥挤二维指标,结合游客访谈,分析了景区的拥挤特征及影响因素。研究发现:① 不同地点物理拥挤与心理拥挤呈现不同的表征关系;② 由于游客目标与需求不同,在资源吸引力、服务设施和空间特征等因素的触发下,导致高山比低山物理拥挤度强,线性空间比点状空间的拥挤感知强烈,这是景区发展不均衡且与游客互动缺乏动态性、主动性和创新性的表现。最后,基于特殊时段和特殊空间背景下多样性和动态性的空间-行为互动模式,提出“奶酪型”“小丑型”“泄洪型”和“花瓶型”四类调控类型。
[6]
杨鹏, 蔚丹丹, 李山. 气候变化背景下的户外体育旅游可持续发展:减缓与适应[J]. 旅游学刊, 2023, 38(8):15-17.
[7]
MANFREDO M J, DRIVER B L, TARRANT M A. Measuring leisure motivation: A meta-analysis of the recreation experience preference scales[J]. Journal of leisure Research, 1996, 28(3): 188-213.
[8]
BORRIE W T, ROGGENBUCK J W, HULL R B. The problem of verbal reports in recreation research: Review, recommendations, and new directions[J]. Tourism Analysis, 1998, 2(3/4): 175-183.
[9]
KIM H O. The relationship among burn out, outdoor recreation experience preferences (REP) and recovery experience : Focusing on the moderating effect of restoration environment[J]. Journal of Tourism Studies, 2020, 32(4): 129-152.
[10]
SCHROEDER S A, CORNICELLI L, FUITON D C, et al. The influence of motivation versus experience on recreation satisfaction: How appreciative-versus achievement-oriented recreation experience preferences relate to hunter satisfaction[J]. Journal of Leisure Research, 2019, 50(2), 107-131.
[11]
ISL A S E. Toward a social psychological theory of tourism motivation: A rejoinder[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 1982, 9(2):256-262.
[12]
董培海, 李庆雷, 李伟. 大众旅游现象研究综述与诠释[J]. 旅游学刊, 2019, 34(6):135-144.
[13]
国家体育总局关于大力发展体育旅游的指导意见[EB/OL]. (2016-12-22)[2025-12-22]. https://www.sport.gov.cn/n315/n20001395/c20040259/content.html.
[14]
马越斐, 李海. 体育旅游具身体验研究知识谱系:理论溯源、焦点议题、动向研瞻[J]. 山东体育学院学报, 2022, 38(1):58-64.
[15]
蔡君. 对美国LNT(Leave No Trace)游客教育项目的探讨[J]. 旅游学刊, 2003, 18(6):90-94.
[16]
杨占东, 于涛, 赵晨蕾. 中国式现代化背景下体旅融合发展思考[J]. 体育文化导刊, 2024(3):16-22,45.
[17]
蔡礼彬, 朱晓彤. 旅游者-环境契合度会影响环境责任行为吗?——以难忘的旅游体验、地方依恋为中介[J]. 旅游学刊, 2021, 36(7):119-131.
[18]
LIU Z, YANG T, YI C, et al. Effects and functional mechanisms of serious leisure on environmentally responsible behavior of mountain hikers: Mediating effect of place attachments and destination attractiveness[J]. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 2024, 45: 100709.
[19]
YAMASHITA R, AN B. Runners pro-environmental behavior: The role of place attachment and environmental concern[J]. Journal of Global Sport Management, 2024, 9(1): 230-247.
[20]
张婷, 刘晶岚, 丛丽, 等. 感知价值、地方依恋对游客环境责任行为的影响——以北京奥林匹克森林公园为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(6):202-208.
[21]
蔡溢, 杨洋, 殷红梅. 乡村振兴背景下民族旅游村寨居民地方依恋的影响关系及机理分析——基于贵州肇兴侗寨和西江苗寨的对比研究[J]. 贵州社会学, 2020(5):156-162.
[22]
POON A. Tourism, technology and competitive strategies, CAB international[M]. Wallingford: CABI, 1993, 12(4): 32-33.
[23]
CULLER J. Semiotics of tourism[J]. The American Journal of Semiotics, 1981, 1(2): 127-140.
[24]
江金波, 孙韶雄. 怀旧情感对历史文化街区游客环境责任行为的影响研究——感知价值和地方依恋的中介作用[J]. 人文地理, 2021, 36(5):83-91.
[25]
KAPLAN R, KAPLAN S. The experience of nature: A psychological perspective[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989:40-42.
[26]
RIVERA D E, FA M C, VILLAR A S. Delightful tourism experiences: A cognitive or affective matter?[J]. Tourism Management Perspectives, 2019, 32: 1-12.
[27]
KIL N, HOLLAND S M, STEIN T V, et al. Place attachment as a mediator of the relationship between nature-based recreation benefits and future visit intentions[J]. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2012, 20(4): 603-626.
[28]
KYLE G T, MOWEN A J, TARRANT M. Linking place preferences with place meaning: An examination of the relationship between place motivation and place attachment[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2004, 24(4): 439-454.
[29]
KIL N, STEIN T V, HOLLAND S M, et al. The role of place attachment in recreation experience and outcome preferences among forest bathers[J]. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 2021, 35: 100410.
[30]
杨强. 体育旅游产业融合发展的动力与路径机制[J]. 体育学刊, 2016, 23(4):55-62.
[31]
陈扬乐, 崔文昕. 风险感知对冲浪旅游者重游意向的影响——以情绪和体验质量为中介[J]. 热带地理, 2023, 43(10):2024-2034.
以风险边缘理论和情绪评价理论为依据,以海南省万宁市日月湾为案例地,以风险偏好者为调查对象,引入情绪和体验质量作为中介,采用结构方程模型和中介效应分析方法,探究风险感知对冲浪旅游者重游意向的影响机制。结果表明:1)风险感知对冲浪者的情绪唤起有显著的直接正向影响,且情绪在风险感知对冲浪旅游者重游意向的影响中发挥完全中介作用,因此调动旅游者的积极情绪至关重要。2)体验质量在情绪对重游意向的影响中发挥部分中介作用,且中介效应略高于直接效应,因此,冲浪旅游经营者不仅要充分调动冲浪者的积极情绪,更要想方设法让冲浪者获得更高质量的冲浪旅游体验,才能更好地吸引冲浪者重游。3)为促进冲浪旅游可持续发展,日月湾应以风险偏好者为重点营销对象;建立冲浪俱乐部(店)管理规范和冲浪教练考核机制;加强安全监管,护航冲浪体验;助力成功冲浪,激励积极情绪。
[32]
盘劲呈, 李海. 地方依恋与骑行旅游:“动态依附”体验的生成[J]. 体育与科学, 2018, 39(5):63-69,76.
[33]
CHEN N, DWYER L, FIRTH T. Conceptualization and measurement of dimensionality of place attachment[J]. Tourism Analysis, 2014, 19, 323-338.
[34]
LEE T H, JAN F H, YANG C C. Conceptualizing and measuring environmentally responsible behaviors from the perspective of community-based tourists[J]. Tourism Management, 2013, 36: 454-468.
[35]
RAGIN C C. Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008: 44-68.
[36]
陈晔, 曹智辉, 易柳夙, 等. 目的地依恋研究述评:理论框架与研究展望[J]. 旅游学刊, 2024, 39(8):112-126.
[37]
BAMBERG S M, MÖSER G. Twenty years after hines, hungerford, and tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2007, 27(1): 14-25.
[38]
陈涛. 体育旅游探析[J]. 广州体育学院学报, 2000, 18(4):37-40.
[39]
KYLE G, GRAEFE A, MANNING R, et al. Effects of place attachment on users' perceptions of social and environmental conditions in a natural setting[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2004, 24(2):213-225.
[40]
曲颖, 吕兴洋, 沈雪瑞. 大众旅游价值导向调节下地方依恋维度的亲环境驱动效应[J]. 旅游学刊, 2020, 35(3):86-96.
[41]
王娜, 周翔, 卢学英, 等. 旅游者环境态度-行为差距影响因素研究——享乐偏好、感知效力、环境行为成本的调节作用[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2023, 37(10):175-182.
[42]
陈阁芝, 周国林, 刘博. 旅游地支持对游客环境责任行为的影响研究[J]. 旅游学刊, 2023, 38(11):109-123.
[43]
刘巧辉, 王小平, 刘晶岚. 森林公园游客感知价值、满意度与环境责任行为的关系研究[J]. 生态经济, 2022, 38(2):137-141.
PDF(1650 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/