PDF(2582 KB)
The Basic Framework, Collaborative Mechanism, and Innovative Path for the Construction of A Sports Event System with Chinese Characteristics
REN Bo, LI Zhenpeng, PENG Zhouen, LIU Dongfeng
Journal of Capital University of Physical Education and Sports ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1) : 13-26.
PDF(2582 KB)
PDF(2582 KB)
The Basic Framework, Collaborative Mechanism, and Innovative Path for the Construction of A Sports Event System with Chinese Characteristics
The construction of a sports event system with Chinese characteristics is in line with the basic positioning of the strategy of building a strong sports nation, and is of great significance for leading the development of competitive sports events, meeting the sports needs of the people, promoting youth sports health, and promoting the promotion of excellent traditional Chinese sports culture. Research suggests that the Chinese characteristic sports event system is constructed by two major systems: the category system and the composition system. Among them, the category system involves the competitive sports event system, the mass sports event system, and the youth sports event system; The composition system involves hierarchical system, organizational management system, market system, and guarantee system. On this basis, a collaborative mechanism for building a sports event system with Chinese characteristics will be constructed around five dimensions: goals, resources, information, feedback, and configuration. Based on this, an innovative path is proposed: further clarifying the functional positioning of the competitive sports event system and enhancing its value leading role; Optimize the supply of mass sports event services and promote the universal sharing of mass sports event services; Establishing a talent training chain that connects the youth sports event system and improving the mechanism for deep integration of sports and education; Improve the mechanism of hierarchical coordination and resource integration, and enhance the adaptability between the levels of the sports event system; Establish a list of responsibilities for the organizational management system and build a collaborative governance model for diverse social units; Differentiated development of the commercial value of sports events, enhancing the overall value of sports events; Optimize institutional safeguards and long-term mechanisms to form a sustainable sports event system.
sports powerhouse / Chinese characteristics / sports event system / mass sports events / competitive sports events / youth sports events / collaboration mechanism
| [1] |
李树旺, 刘圣文, 刘潇锴. 秩序与活力再平衡:构建完善的体育赛事监管体系[J]. 上海体育学院学报, 2022, 46(9):20-29.
|
| [2] |
姚远, 李军岩. 我国学校体育赛事体系研究[J]. 体育文化导刊, 2018(12):119-124.
|
| [3] |
钟秉枢. 体教融合背景下青少年体育赛事体系完善的路径研究[J]. 体育学研究, 2020, 34(5):13-20.
|
| [4] |
李崟, 李刚, 黄海燕. 全球体育城市视域下上海体育赛事体系构建战略[J]. 上海体育学院学报, 2020, 44(3):17-26.
|
| [5] |
梁莞彤, 徐文月, 邓迪, 等. 传统体育赛事非正式组织文化研究——以顺德青年企业家协会龙舟俱乐部为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2024, 39(5):131-144.
|
| [6] |
郁建兴, 秦上人. 制度化:内涵、类型学、生成机制与评价[J]. 学术月刊, 2015, 47(3):109-117.
|
| [7] |
鲁品越. 从构成论到生成论——系统思想的历史转变[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2015, 29(5):122-130.
从表层的“构成论图景”到深层的“生成论机制”的转变，是当代系统思想的根本性转变。经典自然理论的世界图景是由基本“砖块”及其外部相互作用构成的“复合型世界”，而当代自然科学正趋向于把世界理解为由各个层级“生成元”生成的复杂性世界。在系统科学中表现为从“老三论”到“新三论”的转变。系统动力学揭示了生成论的最根本机制——生成元迭代机制，其在生成论中的作用犹如原子论在构成论中的作用。这一理论与“重整化理论”和分形几何相互同构性的形成机理，则是生成论世界观的深层的客观基础，这就是基于事物内在相互作用的不确定性。
|
| [8] |
王克阳. 《体育赛事活动管理条例》制定的背景、理念及要点[J]. 体育科研, 2025, 46(5):43-51.
|
| [9] |
卢文云, 陈娟, 戴健. 我国竞技体育公共服务体系构建研究[J]. 北京体育大学学报, 2015, 38(7):8-18.
|
| [10] |
李雪颖. 2024年我国运动员获194个世界冠军创历年之最[N]. 中国体育报, 2024-12-27(1).
|
| [11] |
王亚坤, 武传玺, 彭响. 新时代我国群众体育赛事发展困境及优化路径[J]. 体育文化导刊, 2018(11):1-5.
|
| [12] |
2024年中国路跑赛事749场、总规模超704万人次[Z/OL]. (2025-03-22)[2025-11-01]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/sports/20250322/73dd3e674f3044e79db83cc07d241a3e/c.html.
|
| [13] |
陈作松, 汪流, 史文文, 等. 我国青少年体育高质量发展研究[J]. 首都体育学院学报, 2023, 35(5):503-511.
|
| [14] |
李丽, 吕万刚. 青少年体育赛事协同治理的国际经验与启示[J]. 武汉体育学院学报, 2023, 57(2):35-43.
|
| [15] |
马艺欧. 赛事规模空前各界大力支持——中国足球青训最高舞台蕴含潜力价值[N]. 中国体育报, 2022-11-25(5).
|
| [16] |
潘松挺, 姚春序. 基于复杂系统理论的企业网络组织演化分析[J]. 企业经济, 2011, 30(3):13-15.
|
| [17] |
张成, 唐方成. 创客组织的组织协同机制及仿真研究[J]. 管理学报, 2020, 17(7):1033-1042.
基于组织协同理论，分析了创客组织的组织协同机制，并根据组织协同机制建立了系统动力学仿真模型。以深圳市创客组织为例，对创客组织的组织协同度、合作意愿、吸引力、组织风险进行了仿真测度。研究发现：创客、创客组织和协同组织分别位于组织协同系统的核心层、中间层和外围层，其组织协同系统是由要素体系的人才体系、资本体系、创新成果体系和一个组织协同评价体系构成；在组织协同系统中，多组织进行组织协同和资源协作，各组织对外部要素进行输入和输出，通过内外部环境要素的交互响应机制，形成组织协同系统的因果反馈路径，进而影响组织间的协同创新和子系统间的交互行动；仿真结果显示，创客组织具有促进组织协同创新和提高创新竞争力的积极作用。
|
| [18] |
杨桦, 仇军, 陈琦, 等. 新时代我国体育哲学社会科学研究现状与发展趋势——基于国家“十四五”体育学发展规划调研分析[J]. 体育科学, 2020, 40(8):3-26.
|
| [19] |
建设国际赛事之都的探索与实践——上海市体育工作创新典型案例[Z/OL]. (2024-01-30)[2026-01-22]. https://www.sport.gov.cn/n4/n27378157/c27440118/content.html.
|
| [20] |
刘东锋. 中国特色体育赛事体系的内涵阐释、重构动因与实践方略[J]. 体育科学, 2025, 45(12): 12-23.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
